I distinctly remember that, a few months ago, when I was explaining Singapore's gradual reopening policies, many descended on my page, pointing out what a great job HK was doing and how Singaporean government was too hasty and reckless.I cautioned all of them that Hong Kong not
I once heard someone say that the government could technically abolish income tax for most people but it doesn't to give them a sense of participation.While I don't know if the story is true, it's easy to see that instead of a sense
I've been following Titus Low's case lately as it represents a clash of personal liberties and social engineering. How much freedom is too much? And if things are governed by consent of free individuals, is that enough to permit certain behaviors in the society? Obviously, the
Today's "lacking self-awareness" award goes to... Singapore's chief loving critic.So, Alfie complained a few days ago about the somewhat delayed transition in political leadership of the PAP and, by extension, the government. He questions whether CCS, OYK or LW are really the best
If not through CECA are they "stealing" jobs in other ways?
Ten thousand? Hundred thousand? A million? No.
Factors other than the environment are no less - and often more - important.
Brought to you by the country's "loving critic".
Years of planning, environmental studies and public feedback have led to a compromise which, however, will never satisfy the complainers...
Turns out that racism only matters when it fits the agenda.
If you’re telling members of your minority to grow up and stop getting offended all the time you may be a traitor brainwashed into accepting Chinese superiority, writes a millionaire Indian.
Instant gratification mentality, combined with access to social media have created an explosive mix. Victimhood is yielding social benefits for individuals - but may undermine entire societies.
