If meritocracy is getting bad press in the Straits Times itself, how does SPH Media approach spending hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayers money if not by merit?
Every single thing that WP celebrates as its success (even if only partial) puts Singapore's future in jeopardy.
Proposals made by both parties range from mildly damaging to completely destructive to the HDB system.
Pritam Singh alleged PAP has long benefited from redistricting by EBRC. Let's check his claims against facts and figures.
As GE draws near the ruling party is going to have to fend off more attacks on its integrity.
Pritam's incoming trial could seriously shake or even end his political career.
The attention seeking runner is trying to stir controversy again - but is he in a position to preach?
According to the Economist, Singapore is a hellhole for political opposition, incessantly attacked by the oppressive government. Really?
If you don't like Singapore's allegiances you can always change the country for one that sides with terrorists. Just cross the northern border.
He may not be seen as a leader equal to his father but his influence on Singapore was no less transformative - though few seem to admit it.
So, why did PAP decide to save Pritam and amended the constitution, raising the minimum fine that would lead to mandatory disqualification from parliament to $10,000 instead of earlier $2000? Wouldn't it be better to leave it as it was, to increase the chances of him losing
